Skip to Main Content

Getting started

Learn about systematic reviews, and how they differ from literature reviews.

What is a systematic review?

". . . attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question. The key characteristics of a systematic review are:

  • clearly defined question with inclusion & exclusion criteria
  • rigorous & systematic search of all the literature
  • critical appraisal of included studies
  • data extraction and management
  • analysis & interpretation of result
  • report for publication" (Duke University).

Systematic reviews may include a meta-analysis (a quantitative method used to synthesise and summarise results). Meta-synthesis is the use of statistical methods to combine data from studies included in a systematic review. 

Systematic reviews v. literature reviews

  Systematic review Literature review
Goals

Answer a focused clinical question

Eliminate bias

Provide summary or overview of topic
Question

Clearly defined and answerable clinical question

Recommend using PICO as a guide

Can be a general topic or a specific question
Components

Pre-specified eligibility criteria

Systematic search strategy

Assessment of the validity of findings

Interpretation and presentation of results

Reference list

Introduction

Methods

Discussion

Conclusion

Reference list

Number of authors Three or more One or more
Timeline

Months to years

Average eighteen months

Weeks to months
Requirements

Thorough knowledge of topic

Perform searches of all relevant databases

Statistical analysis resources (for meta-analysis)

Understanding of topic

Perform searches of one or more databases

Value

Connects practicing clinicians to high quality evidence

Supports evidence-based practice

Provides summary of literature on a topic

This table is a derivative of What's In a Name?: the Difference Between a Systematic Review and a Literature Review and Why It Matters by Lynn Kysh / CC-BY